NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Friday said right to live in a pollution free atmosphere was a part of the fundamental right as it struck down Centre’s office memorandum allowing ex post facto or retrospective environmental clearances to projects in violation of norms.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made scathing remarks in its judgement delivered on a plea filed by Vanashakti organisation and said, “Union govt, as much as individual citizens, has a constitutional obligation to protect the environment.”
The court said it “must come down very heavily” on Centre’s attempt to do “something which is completely prohibited under the law”. It added, “Cleverly, the words ex post facto have not been used, but without using those words, there is a provision to effectively grant ex post facto EC. The 2021 OM has been issued in violation of the decisions of this court….”
The bench, therefore, declared the 2021 office memorandum (OM) and related circulars “arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006”. Centre, as a result, was restrained from issuing directions for grant of ex post facto clearances in any form or manner or for regularising the acts done in contravention of the EIA notification.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made scathing remarks in its judgement delivered on a plea filed by Vanashakti organisation and said, “Union govt, as much as individual citizens, has a constitutional obligation to protect the environment.”
The court said it “must come down very heavily” on Centre’s attempt to do “something which is completely prohibited under the law”. It added, “Cleverly, the words ex post facto have not been used, but without using those words, there is a provision to effectively grant ex post facto EC. The 2021 OM has been issued in violation of the decisions of this court….”
The bench, therefore, declared the 2021 office memorandum (OM) and related circulars “arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006”. Centre, as a result, was restrained from issuing directions for grant of ex post facto clearances in any form or manner or for regularising the acts done in contravention of the EIA notification.
You may also like
Indian-origin Berkeley graduate claims he fooled investors. He has no product, no pitch
Ange Postecoglou loses key Tottenham ally as ex-Premier League club swoop
Josh Hazlewood: The Key Player for RCB in IPL Final Against PBKS
Husband of Parks and Recreation star shot dead speaks out on attack for first time
Urgent warning issued to cancer patients over dodgy 'cure' claims spreading online
